Friday, March 6, 2015

Common Problems Associated with Oral Care

 Common problems associated with oral care – caries, and link caries and periodontal diseases
Dental diseases is among one of the most prevalent chronic illness that has a direct impact on the social, physical, and psychological well being of our society. Per the Center of Disease Control and prevention (2014) “Periodontal disease and tooth decay are the two biggest threats to dental health.” This condition could affect all ages and all socio-economic layers, but the most affected are the under served groups. The ranges of this condition begins affecting children early in life in a form of caries developing later into periodontal conditions to more serious conditions.

Oral Health determinants are those that affect the general health and well being of individuals. Factors such as economic, environmental and social conditions determines oral health knowledge and behavior. Oral diseases share risk factors with other chronic conditions in particular, poor diet is a principal cause of tooth decay. The National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (2014) identifies tobacco as main contributor to gum disease and oral cancer. Tooth decay (caries) is one of the most prevalent chronic condition.
Reduction of tooth decay in the last 30 years has been due to fluoridation and toothpaste availability. Our children have less tooth decay than their parents did at that age, but this condition is still 5 times more prevalent than asthma. Per the Center of Disease Control and prevention (2014) tooth decay left untreated cause pain that will produce issues with eating, speaking, playing, and learning. Risks factors for tooth decay include high sugar diet as soda pop, carbonated beverages, plaque buildup, and poor dental hygiene, minimal or low exposure to fluoride, low income, and smoking, among others.
The major contributing factor to periodontal disease (gum) is plaque but there are other conditions, which are: age, smoking/tobacco use, genetics, drugs, medications, stress, clenching/grinding teeth, obesity, poor diet, and other systemic diseases. As tooth decay is ignored and the condition continues to advance to the gum, an increase of bacteria starts to invade the mucosa of the gum and produces infection. This infection may cause damage of the root of the tooth or the jaw bone and eventually affecting other organs of the body by lowering the immune system and increasing the risk of overwhelming infections. The Center of Disease Control and Prevention (2011) states that gum disease may damage other parts and be associated with other health issues such as diabetes, heart disease, stroke, premature birth, and more.
Education and early habit forming has been proven to be effective and affordable way of prevention. Implementation of a health care initiative in oral health would start at pediatrician offices with oral checks and dental care education, followed by yearly checks of a dental hygienist from elementary school to high school. Another aspect of the initiative is to continue to use public water fluoridation in all states and educate the population that use well water.         
                                                                                      

References
American Academy of Periodontology (2014). Gum Disease Risk Factors. Retrieved from
http://www.perio.org/consumer/risk-factors
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013). Preventing Dental Caries with Community Programs. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/oralhealth/publications/factsheets/dental_caries.htm
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Preventing Cavities, Gum Disease, Tooth Loss, and Oral Cancers. Oral Health. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/resources/publications/aag/doh.htm
Images and graphics retrieved from https://www.google.com/search?q=dental+health&rlz=1C1CHWA_enUS625US626&espv=2&biw=1080&bih=622&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=V-f3VPmxMom7ogTch4LQDg&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAg&dpr=2
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (2014). Retrieved from

http://www.nidcr.nih.gov/DataStatistics/SurgeonGeneral/sgr/part1.htm


2 comments:

  1. You did a great job on your blog. Your comment regarding fluoridation is of special interest to me. I am from the Bennington, Vermont area and I like to remain abreast of the news from home. Just recently, a community vote was held to decide on fluoridation of the community's water (Whitcomb Jr. & Carson, 2015). Fluoridation was not supported with a vote of 1,539 versus the 1,117 supporters (Whitcomb Jr. & Carson, 2015).

    In 2012, community members developed the Bennington Oral Health Coalition (Whitcomb Jr. & Carson, 2015). The ballot question was a result of the coalition's desire to address the community's oral health needs (Whitcomb Jr. & Carson, 2015). The coalition worked to educate the community regarding the benefits of fluoridation and how a small investment in the community's dental well-being could improve public health and reduce the economic costs related to invasive dental care and lost work days (Whitcomb Jr. & Carson, 2015). Community members who did not support the fluoridation effort joined together and formed the "Bennington Citizens Against Fluoridated Water" (Whitcomb Jr. & Carson, 2015, para. 7). The objections are not clearly stated in the article. One comment described fluoridation as being administered medication without consent (Whitcomb Jr. & Carson, 2015).

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2013) provides an overview of the evidence-based literature surrounding the safety of fluoridated community water. I found the CDC review of the history of fluoridation in the United States interesting (2013). The initial fluoride recommendations were set at 0.7 to 1.2 milligrams per liter by the U.S. Public Health Service in 1962 (CDC, 2013). In 2010, the Department of Health and Human Services developed new fluoride recommendation of 0.7 milligrams per liter (CDC, 2013). The lowered recommendation was due to the availability of fluoride products (toothpaste, rinse, supplements, and topical products) (CDC, 2013). Interestingly, when I reviewed the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (2013) data, 4.0 milligram per liter is their enforceable level.

    Colleen

    References

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013, July 10). Community water fluoridation. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/safety/systematic.htm
    United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2013, July 23). Basic information about fluoride in drinking water. Retrieved from http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/fluoride.cfm
    Whitcomb Jr., K., & Carson, D. (2015, March 4). Bennington voters reject fluoridation. Retrieved from http://vtdigger.org/2015/03/04/bennington-voters-reject-fluoridation/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello Colleen,
    Thank you for answering our post with such an interesting topic.
    In module 8 I had posted a question and answer about this topic, please see below;


    Currently not all states have agreed to fluoridate water supplies because there is a controversy of medicating without proper consent and the possibility of other health repercussions. Should we obtain a consent for treatment? Should the consent include a clause that states that treatment should be continued throughout life?

    Fluoridation per the Center of Disease Control and Prevention (2013) is an inexpensive way to prevent caries and has been used for 65 years, of which they refered to as one of the 10th greatest accomplishments of public health. In 2012, 74.6% of the population on public water had fluoridated water and the cost was estimated that for every one dollar spent saves 38.00 dollars in cost savings. Even though benefits are well justified there are some movements against fluoridation like Fluoride Action Network that argues that there could be potential ethical and physical repercussions. As an example of ethical repercussions, the national conference of state legislatures states the fact that with the fluoridation of water the government is medicating the population without consent.
    It make sense that the dose of recommended fluoride in public water is decreasing due to the availability of this compound in oral care products. What is interesting is that we buy these products and do not give consent for treatment.

    References
    Center of disease control and prevention. (2013). Community Water Fluoridation. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/statistics/index.htm

    National Conference of State Legislatures. (2015). Children Oral Health. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/childrens-oral-health-policy-issues-overview.aspx

    Thanks again,
    Neydi

    ReplyDelete